Summary
Difficulty: ★★★☆☆
Covers: Longitudinal vs cross-sectional, cohort and waves, paired t-test, McNemar’s test, correlation, chi-square test of independence, cohort effects, longitudinal design considerations
What is a longitudinal design?
- A longitudinal design measures the same people repeatedly over time
- Focus is on timing, not just group comparison
- Key idea: tracking change or prediction across time
- Can be experimental or non-experimental
- Non-experimental (surveys, cohorts) are more common
- Used to understand
- How behaviour or psychology changes
- How earlier variables predict later outcomes
Longitudinal vs cross-sectional
- Cross-sectional
- Different people measured once
- Faster and cheaper
- Cannot track true change
- Vulnerable to cohort effects
- Longitudinal
- Same people measured multiple times
- Slower and more expensive
- Can track real change and temporal order
- Cross-sequential
- Combines both approaches
- Multiple age groups followed for shorter periods
Key longitudinal terms
- Cohort
- A group of people with shared characteristics
- Example: all first-year psych students in 2022
- Waves
- The different time points of measurement
- Pre–post design
- Simplest longitudinal design
- One group measured before and after something
Two types of longitudinal questions
Change over time
- Question type
- Does something change over time?
- Same variable measured repeatedly
- Independent variable
- Time
- Dependent variable
- The construct of interest (e.g. anxiety, happiness, symptoms)
- Examples
- Does anxiety change before and after public speaking?
- Does academic self-efficacy change across a semester?
- Appropriate analyses
- Numeric DV: paired t-test (two time points)
- Categorical DV: McNemar’s test (two time points)
- More than two time points: advanced models (later years)
Predicting over time
- Question type
- Does something measured earlier predict something later?
- Different variables measured at different times
- Independent variable
- Predictor measured at Time 1
- Dependent variable
- Outcome measured at Time 2
- Examples
- Does childhood self-esteem predict adult happiness?
- Do early personality traits predict later health?
- Important reminder
- Prediction ≠ causation
- Appropriate analyses
- Numeric variables: correlation
- Categorical variables: chi-square test of independence
- Advanced models may control for confounds
Experimental longitudinal designs
- Often randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
- Participants randomly assigned to conditions
- Outcome measured later in time
- Examples
- Therapy effects measured one year later
- Study-skills intervention measured at graduation
- Stronger support for causal conclusions
Change over time with numeric data
- Same numeric variable measured at two time points
- Analysis
- Paired t-test
- Null hypothesis
- Mean difference = 0
- Key assumption
- Difference scores are approximately normally distributed
- Effect size
- Cohen’s d = mean difference / SD of differences
- Interpretation
- Significant result → evidence of change over time
- Non-significant result → no evidence of change
Change over time with categorical data
- Same categorical variable measured twice
- Data are dependent (same people)
- Chi-square test of independence is NOT appropriate
- Correct analysis
- McNemar’s test
- Focus
- Whether the proportion before equals the proportion after
- Only the off-diagonal cells matter (people who changed)
McNemar’s test
- Used when
- Two dependent categorical variables
- Binary outcomes (yes/no)
- Hypotheses
- H0: proportion before = proportion after
- H1: proportions differ
- Test statistic
- Based on people who changed categories
- Interpretation
- Significant result → proportions changed over time
- Effect size
- Can use Cohen’s W
- Small effects are common, even if significant
Predicting over time with numeric data
- Use correlation
- Looks at whether higher scores at Time 1 relate to higher or lower scores at Time 2
- Important
- Focus on patterns across time
- Directionality is clearer than cross-sectional data
- Still not proof of causation
Predicting over time with categorical data
- Use chi-square test of independence
- Variables are measured at different times but are independent
- Example
- Early exposure (yes/no) predicting later outcome (yes/no)
Longitudinal design considerations
- Cohort effects
- Differences may reflect generation, not development
- Test–retest effects
- Improvement may be due to familiarity, not real change
- Attrition (drop-out)
- Common in long studies
- Check whether drop-outs differ from retained participants
- Time and resources
- Longitudinal research is expensive and slow
- Retrospective data
- Asking people to recall past experiences
- Easier, but vulnerable to recall bias
Choosing the correct test in longitudinal designs
- Same people, numeric outcome, two time points
- Paired t-test
- Same people, categorical outcome, two time points
- McNemar’s test
- Different variables over time, numeric
- Correlation
- Different variables over time, categorical
- Chi-square test of independence
So Overall…
- Longitudinal designs track people over time
- Two main question types
- Change over time
- Predicting over time
- The design determines the analysis
- Dependent data require different tests than independent data
- Longitudinal research helps clarify temporal order, but not always causation
- Always match your conclusions to your method
Leave a comment