STAT 1103 Week 9 Notes: Longitudinal Designs

Summary

Difficulty: ★★★☆☆

Covers: Longitudinal vs cross-sectional, cohort and waves, paired t-test, McNemar’s test, correlation, chi-square test of independence, cohort effects, longitudinal design considerations

What is a longitudinal design?
  • A longitudinal design measures the same people repeatedly over time
  • Focus is on timing, not just group comparison
  • Key idea: tracking change or prediction across time
  • Can be experimental or non-experimental
    • Non-experimental (surveys, cohorts) are more common
  • Used to understand
    • How behaviour or psychology changes
    • How earlier variables predict later outcomes
Longitudinal vs cross-sectional
  • Cross-sectional
    • Different people measured once
    • Faster and cheaper
    • Cannot track true change
    • Vulnerable to cohort effects
  • Longitudinal
    • Same people measured multiple times
    • Slower and more expensive
    • Can track real change and temporal order
  • Cross-sequential
    • Combines both approaches
    • Multiple age groups followed for shorter periods
Key longitudinal terms
  • Cohort
    • A group of people with shared characteristics
    • Example: all first-year psych students in 2022
  • Waves
    • The different time points of measurement
  • Pre–post design
    • Simplest longitudinal design
    • One group measured before and after something
Two types of longitudinal questions

Change over time

  • Question type
    • Does something change over time?
  • Same variable measured repeatedly
  • Independent variable
    • Time
  • Dependent variable
    • The construct of interest (e.g. anxiety, happiness, symptoms)
  • Examples
    • Does anxiety change before and after public speaking?
    • Does academic self-efficacy change across a semester?
  • Appropriate analyses
    • Numeric DV: paired t-test (two time points)
    • Categorical DV: McNemar’s test (two time points)
    • More than two time points: advanced models (later years)

Predicting over time

  • Question type
    • Does something measured earlier predict something later?
  • Different variables measured at different times
  • Independent variable
    • Predictor measured at Time 1
  • Dependent variable
    • Outcome measured at Time 2
  • Examples
    • Does childhood self-esteem predict adult happiness?
    • Do early personality traits predict later health?
  • Important reminder
    • Prediction ≠ causation
  • Appropriate analyses
    • Numeric variables: correlation
    • Categorical variables: chi-square test of independence
    • Advanced models may control for confounds
Experimental longitudinal designs
  • Often randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
  • Participants randomly assigned to conditions
  • Outcome measured later in time
  • Examples
    • Therapy effects measured one year later
    • Study-skills intervention measured at graduation
  • Stronger support for causal conclusions
Change over time with numeric data
  • Same numeric variable measured at two time points
  • Analysis
    • Paired t-test
  • Null hypothesis
    • Mean difference = 0
  • Key assumption
    • Difference scores are approximately normally distributed
  • Effect size
    • Cohen’s d = mean difference / SD of differences
  • Interpretation
    • Significant result → evidence of change over time
    • Non-significant result → no evidence of change
Change over time with categorical data
  • Same categorical variable measured twice
  • Data are dependent (same people)
  • Chi-square test of independence is NOT appropriate
  • Correct analysis
    • McNemar’s test
  • Focus
    • Whether the proportion before equals the proportion after
  • Only the off-diagonal cells matter (people who changed)
McNemar’s test
  • Used when
    • Two dependent categorical variables
    • Binary outcomes (yes/no)
  • Hypotheses
    • H0: proportion before = proportion after
    • H1: proportions differ
  • Test statistic
    • Based on people who changed categories
  • Interpretation
    • Significant result → proportions changed over time
  • Effect size
    • Can use Cohen’s W
    • Small effects are common, even if significant
Predicting over time with numeric data
  • Use correlation
  • Looks at whether higher scores at Time 1 relate to higher or lower scores at Time 2
  • Important
    • Focus on patterns across time
    • Directionality is clearer than cross-sectional data
    • Still not proof of causation
Predicting over time with categorical data
  • Use chi-square test of independence
  • Variables are measured at different times but are independent
  • Example
    • Early exposure (yes/no) predicting later outcome (yes/no)
Longitudinal design considerations
  • Cohort effects
    • Differences may reflect generation, not development
  • Test–retest effects
    • Improvement may be due to familiarity, not real change
  • Attrition (drop-out)
    • Common in long studies
    • Check whether drop-outs differ from retained participants
  • Time and resources
    • Longitudinal research is expensive and slow
  • Retrospective data
    • Asking people to recall past experiences
    • Easier, but vulnerable to recall bias
Choosing the correct test in longitudinal designs
  • Same people, numeric outcome, two time points
    • Paired t-test
  • Same people, categorical outcome, two time points
    • McNemar’s test
  • Different variables over time, numeric
    • Correlation
  • Different variables over time, categorical
    • Chi-square test of independence
So Overall…
  • Longitudinal designs track people over time
  • Two main question types
    • Change over time
    • Predicting over time
  • The design determines the analysis
  • Dependent data require different tests than independent data
  • Longitudinal research helps clarify temporal order, but not always causation
  • Always match your conclusions to your method

Leave a comment